Bay Area Real Estate Market Newsletter ("BAREMN") as of April 5, 2007

Executive Summary

The median price was around $735,000 to $760,000 for much of 2005 through March 2006. April through July 2006 prices were in record high territory of $775,000 to $819,950. August through November 2006 experienced price stabilization at $770,000 to $775,000. December 2006 and January 2007 median Sold price declined to $738,000 and $740,000. February saw price increase to $790,000, returning to the middle of the 2006 record setting price territory. Now March 2007 saw price increase into record high territory of $830,000.

Normally the San Mateo - Santa Clara County border tends to lead local real estate market trends. However, the current trend seems to be closing in on this area from the outlaying areas. The northwest area of SCC is doing much better than the County as a whole.

SCC inventory is 120% of the 8-year average. Sales volume remains dramatically low at only 81% of the 8-year average. The inventory and sales volume data is not adjusted for growth, so approximately 107% would be normal for both.  Days of Unsold Inventory is at 132% of the 8-year average is self adjusting for growth as it is the ratio of inventory to sales.

In SCC, low sales volume has resulted in March 2007 initiated sales being below every years except 2001. SMC only had 454 initiated sales worse than any year except 2001. At only 174 Santa Cruz County exactly tied March 2001 level. At only 180, Monterey set a new low failing to meet their previous low volume of 211 transactions set back in 2001. Monterey also deceased from 10% from February 2007 level of 199. These two Counties document the weakness of the local real estate market as you move away from the SMC-SCC border. The condo market didn't do much better in MTY, where they set a record low with only 21 initiated sales a record low. At 443 initiated sales, SCC only beat 2001, but in large part this was because of the number of condo/townhouses built during the past 6 year. At 156 initiated sales, SMC also just beat their 2001 level of 132. At 49 transactions, SZC beat both 2001 and 2006 levels. 

In SCC and SMC, inventory is approaching record high levels but both 2001 and 2003 had more inventory. SZC and MTY are currently setting new record high levels of inventory. The decrease in demand coupled with the increase in supply has moved most of the region into what we consider a Buyer's market. However, the real estate market is not that simple and the notable exception is the area close to the SMC - SCC border that is still a Seller's market. The northwest quadrant of SCC is still in a Seller's market with only 21 to 25 days of unsold inventory. Other areas such as North Valley, Milpitas, Santa Clara, Willow Glen, Blossom Valley Cambrian, Campbell, Los Gatos and Saratoga are slower with 60-80 days of unsold inventory, which we consider a balanced market. Finally areas such as South County, Evergreen, East Valley, Central San Jose and South San Jose have 100 to 125 days of unsold inventory or a buyer's market. East Valley currently has just over 200 days of unsold inventory. This geographic based discrepancy is abnormal. In SCC, the hottest price range is between $750,000 and $1,000,000 with only 61 Days of Unsold Inventory. In general, the higher price range has higher DUI.

Inventory - Inventory in SCC and SMC is greater than any year except 2001 and 2003 since we started collecting data in 1998. Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties are setting record high levels of inventory.

Median Days On the Market – This data is starting to become meaningful as the MLS retroactively corrected the data back to October 1, 2006 preventing listing agents from resetting DOM to zero by re-listing the property, even though the property was not off the market for 30-days. With the influx of new listings that occurs during the first quarter of every year, DOM is not a good indicator of market conditions at this time of year. Remember days on market tends to be a lagging indicator as it takes times for listings to age. 

Median List Price – 829,500. This is a $90,000 increase from just December and is a new record high beating the previous record of $800,000 set in May 2006. Seller's expectations tend to lag changes in the market. With the amount of overbidding approaching 40% combined with the increase in Sales Price to List Price ratio we would expect some continued upward pressure on Sold Price. This increase is helped by the speed of the high-end and the slowness of the low-end.

Number of initiated sales - March 2007 only beat 2001. The reduction in volume is pretty amazing considering just 22 months ago was the highest sales volume. SCC went from record high volume of sales to record low volume of sales in a short span. Most of this slow down actually occurred in late 2005 and early 2006 even though prices continued upward through June 2006. As with the stock market, low volume takes away the significance of the current price increase.

Sold Price - $830,000 This surpassed the previous record of $819,950 set in May 2006. SCC has not yet experienced a year-over-year price decline. SMC experienced a $107K drop from $940,000 in June 2006 to only $833,000 in September 2006 has recovered some and is currently at $906,000 but still below its record of $940,000 set in May 2006. This is only up $7,000 from March 2005. Sold price tends to lag behind market changes and reflects market conditions 25 to 95 days ago.

Average Sold Price to List Price ratio – 100.3% This had reached 100.7% in June 2006, before decreasing each month to 98.9% in December 2006 before increasing since reaching the current level of 100.3%. We consider 98.5% normal. Remember, this reflects market conditions 25 to 95 days ago because of the length of escrow and how this data is collected. This is one of the few times where a mean (average) is more useful than the median. The median would almost always be 100%.

Percent of completed sales with a Sold Price greater than the List Price – 40.8%. This dropped from it's all time peak of 75.2% in April 2005 (surpassing the 2000 record of 74.8%) to a low of 44.2% in January 2006 before increasing again reaching the 2006 peak of 53.5% in May. It had declined through November 2006 at 31.6% before increasing since November 2006 to reach 40.8%. Currently, two in five sellers are receiving more than their asking price. Getting more than asking usually happens because of multiple offers. Buyers learned from 2000 and appear more comfortable paying above the asking price but are more conservative in the amount of over bidding compared to April 2000.

Number of Completed Sales – 890 this is almost a record low number of completed transactions beating the 843 level back in 2001. The low number of transactions remains our biggest concern. Many recent months have had the second lowest number of completed sales with only 2001 having fewer completed sales. Remember this does not take into consideration the growth in SCC and if SCC grew at only 1% each year the number should be 895.

Continued multi-year improvement in price indicates that real estate remains a good long-term investment. Real estate market prices that have been flat for several years (April 2000 through February 2004) clearly reached a new level in 2004 of about $635,000 and another new level in 2005 of about $750,000. It is now apparently 2006 set another new level of $820,000 before retreating. 2007 is currently setting a new level for 2007 and with the jump in median List price it is likely this will increase again in April. However, part of this increase is a result of the sub-prime loan issue disproportionately negatively impacting the low-end of the market.

The media typically uses data from public records that often combine condos/townhouses with single-family homes. Our data is based on MLS data, which allows separation of this data. We believe the MLS data is more reflective of actual real estate market conditions in part because related party transactions are excluded. Because the media uses public records a lot of the most expensive transactions are not counted as the transfer tax is recorded on the back of the grant deed. The media frequently combines data for the 9-Counties that touch the Bay. Although Santa Clara / San Mateo border often leads local trends, the current market trends seems to being influenced by the slow-down in the outlaying areas and collapsing back onto the San Mateo/Santa Clara County border. We believe it is important to look at each County separately to more accurately determine real estate market conditions because real estate remains a local investment.

In June 2006, San Mateo County's median Sold price increased to $940,000 setting a new record for the first time since April 2005 when it was $922,000. This recovery was enough to change the negative annual appreciation SMC experienced in March and April 2006 and make it positive for May and June. Then SMC dropped $107,000 to $833,000. This caused the annual appreciation for SMC went negative again in July through October combined with low volume of completed sales. Price then increased reaching the current level of $909,000. This resulted in November 2006 through March 2007 having annual appreciation of $27,000, $10,000, $5,000, $8,000 and $31,000. It is noteworthy that although SMC is up $31,000 over the last year, it is only up $7,000 over the past two years.

Santa Cruz County experienced a year-over-year price appreciation of $11,000.

Monterey County's at $669,000 the median Sold price is off $16,000 from March 2006 and off $31,000 the $700,000 record set in February 2006 This represents an annual price depreciation of about 2%. Days of unsold inventory is a full year, which unfortunately is a record high for any March since 1999.

Although the data contained here is the most complete, factual and up-to-date monthly Silicon Valley Real Estate market conditions data widely available, Creekside Realty does distribute a weekly version to our clients. The weekly version contains additional data not included in this monthly report. The purpose of the weekly version is to let our clients know what the real estate market is doing now, not 90 days ago. The weekly version assists our clients in making more informed real estate decisions. Previous weekly updates may be reviewed here.

The comments expressed here are based on the overall market conditions for single-family homes as shown in the data displayed in the attached links. These general real estate market conditions will not apply to all price and geographic segments of a given market. This monthly analysis does not reflect the additional data in our weekly version that is available exclusively to Creekside Realty clients. If you are considering a sale or purchase you should get real estate market condition data for your specific situation. Creekside Realty can provide that data to those who are interested in becoming clients.

Data for 4-counties (San Mateo County, Santa Clara County, Santa Cruz County and Monterey County) is available via web links. By reviewing all these Counties you will get a more global understanding. The easiest way to accomplish this is to use the top left link "Graphs-house" and step through the 13 graphs. 

Readers are encouraged to read the introduction section until they are familiar with Bay Area Real Estate Market Newsletter. The introduction explains many of the unique features, lists frequently used abbreviations, and provides detailed explanations of the data that is used in the Bay Area Real Estate Market Newsletter. Your thoughts and/or comments about the real estate market conditions and/or Bay Area Real Estate Market Newsletter are always appreciated. Creekside Realty would like to assist you with your real estate needs; just email us.

Background

During the past 6-years of collecting and analyzing real estate data for Silicon Valley daily, weekly and monthly; it has become clear that adjusting a real estate purchase and/or sale by even a few months has become important in order to improve the investment aspect of your real estate holdings. It is equally important to know when to be conservative and when to be aggressive with your real estate pricing strategy.

Creekside Realty believes the old saying 'just buy and hold real estate for the long-term' can be improved significantly by adjusting the timing of your purchase and/or sale by just a couple of months. This is because the local real estate market has become volatile. There have been 4 peaks of about $570K and 3 valleys of about $500K since April 2000. Santa Clara County prices increased 17.2% in just 4 months early in 2002. Longer-term, prices increased 108% in 21 months and fell 43% in a different 21 months.

Since the MLS transition in July 2003 there have been numerous challenges. Unfortunately, we continue to question the accuracy of the MLS database, which is our source for our analysis. The most significant remaining issues are:

     1) DOM (days on the market): This use to be the length of time a property was published on the MLS. Currently, this data is based on the list date entered by the listing agent. This means that DOM can be reset to zero at any time by the listing agent by simply re-listing the same property and may have no relation to when the property went onto the MLS. As the market slows down more agents will re-list their properties. Therefore DOM will be low and not accurately reflect the degree of market slowing.

     2) Number of initiated Sales: This is still being significantly overstated. Previously, the sales date was the date the sales was first reported to the MLS. Currently, there are several events that cause this sales date to be over-written by a current date. If this happens to be in a subsequent month then the initiated sale will count in both the original AND the subsequent month. 

     3) Number of Closings: This is also being overstated, but to a much smaller degree. Sometimes the MLS fails to delete the original listing when an agent re-lists a property. The listing agent reports the sale and closing on both listings causing a double count. This also cause an over stating of the inventory when the listing prior to the offer being accepted. We have also found a listing that closed in December 2003 but was being reported by the MLS as also closing in May 2004. 

Fortunately, we believe that these errors are randomly distributed with respect to the price and therefore the median prices reported should be pretty accurate.