|
Bay Area Real Estate Market Newsletter
("BAREMN")
as of September 5, 2004
Executive Summary
Although
the real estate market remains robust based on any historical benchmark, prices
have leveled off and have dropped to $625,000. Volume is also decreasing. This
is 'normal' behavior for the Santa Clara County real estate market for this time
of the year. San Mateo
County experienced a slight increase to $779,500. This is still below their peak
of $800.000.
August's Analysis
The local real estate market
continues to improve as we have moved past the
annual holidays although the is signs of slowing, especially in SCC..
|
|
SMC
|
SCC
|
SZC
|
MTY
|
|
Inventory
|
decreasing
|
decreasing
|
increasing
|
increasing
|
|
Sales
|
decreasing
|
decreasing
|
increasing
|
flat
|
|
Marketing
time
|
increasing
|
increasing
|
increasing
|
increasing
|
Data
Inventory
- has started to decrease. Inventory remains normal based on the past 6 years. There is wide
spread believe that inventory is very limited. This is because last year had
unusually high inventory. Also, with the record volume of initiated sales,
normal inventory seems inadequate. Inventory has been decreasing more
rapidly than normal all year. If this continues there will be a lack of
inventory.
Median Days On
the Market – The
marketing time for
initiated sales is continuing to increase. The real increase in DOM is greater
because listing agents can now artificially reset the DOM to zero by simply
re-listing the property as a result of the changes at the MLS. There has been
some unusual behavior with the days on market data to the point we can not trust
the raw data.
Median
List Price – $619,950
off $10,000 from the all time record high that was set in May & June. This
is flat from July and indicates that the sellers expectations have increased
just as buyers are willing to pay less.
Number
of initiated sales - Initiated
sales that had been setting all time records in both terms of absolute number of homes entering
escrow each day and in terms of percentage of normal volume for the time of
year. Sales have dropped for the third month. In fact, sales reached 170% or normal but is currently down to 150% of
normal. Part of this record volume is artificially caused by the
MLS issues mentioned above. The media typically doesn't report on
initiated sales until they are
converted to completed sales that are less effected by the MLS errors.
Sold
Price
- $635,000
After setting new record highs for several months prices have started to drop.
Although SCC took a $15,000 hit in July. This follows a $2,000 decrease in July. SMC
increased $10,000 but that follows a $30,000 hit in July. Sold price
tends to
lag behind market changes and reflects market conditions 25 to 95 days
ago.
Average
Sold Price to List Price ratio
– 100.9%
This has actually dropped each month since April and is an indication that
the market has been slowing even though it remains strong. We consider 98.5%
normal. Remember, this reflects market conditions 25 to 95 days ago because of
the length of escrow and how this data is collected. This is one of the few
times where a mean (average) is more useful than the median. The median would
almost always be100%.
Percent
of completed sales with a Sold Price greater than the List Price
– 52.7%. This indicates that more than 1 out of every 2 properties receives multiple offers.
This has also been dropping slightly since May.
Number
of Completed Sales
– 1546
Dropping 96 transactions after a significant drop of 223 transactions in July from
June.
The multi-year
improvement in price indicates that real estate remains a good long-term
investment. Real estate market prices that have been flat for the last
several years (April 2000 through February 2004) have clearly reached a new
level. June's median Sold price was the near term
peak.
We
continue to be amazed by the volume of sales combined with the general
weakness of the economy. The media focuses on year-over-year data in part because
NAR and CAR maintain that because of the seasonal aspects of real estate yearly
trends are more significant than monthly or other trends. Consequently, we expect
the annual numbers to be the focus of media coverage and that is very positive
news despite the significant monthly drop in volume and the small drop
in price.
The media
typically uses data from public records that often combine condos/townhouses with
single-family homes. Our data is based on MLS data, which allows separation
of this data. We believe the MLS data is more reflective of actual
real estate market conditions in part because related party transactions are
excluded. Also, most of the media's data combines data
for the 9-Counties that touch the Bay. Santa Clara County is being the
hardest hit. Santa Clara often leads local trends. We believe it is
important to look at each County separately to more accurately determine real
estate market conditions because real estate remains a local investment.
San
Mateo County, Santa Cruz County & Monterey County
San Mateo
County's median Sold price increased $10,000 from the record set in June and now
sits at $779,500. This is $20,000 below the peak in June. There is no
question that the appreciation has flattened and reversed directions. We
expect an additional drop in September.
Santa
Cruz County is at $639,000. This ties the $639,000 achieved in May and
represents a full recovery from the $40,000 drop that SZC experienced in June.
Monterey
County's median Sold came in at $555,000 this is a drop of $20,000 from the June
peak.
Preamble
Although
the data contained here is the most complete, factual and up-to-date monthly Silicon
Valley Real Estate market conditions data widely available, Creekside Realty does
distribute a weekly version to our clients. The weekly version contains
additional data not included in this monthly report. The purpose of the weekly
version is to let our clients know what the real estate market is doing
now, not 90 days ago. The weekly version assists our clients in making more
informed real estate decisions. Previous weekly updates may be reviewed
here.
The
comments expressed here are based on the overall market conditions for
single-family homes as shown in the data displayed in the attached links.
These general real estate market conditions will
not apply to all price and geographic segments of a given market. This monthly
analysis does not reflect the additional data in our weekly
version that is available exclusively to Creekside Realty clients. If you are
considering a sale or purchase you should get real estate market condition data
for your specific situation. Creekside Realty can provide that data to those who
are interested in becoming clients.
Data
for 4-counties (San Mateo County, Santa Clara County, Santa Cruz County and Monterey
County) is available via web links. By reviewing all these Counties you will
get a more global understanding. The easiest way to accomplish this is to use
the top left link "Graphs-house" and step through the 13 graphs.
Readers
are encouraged to read the introduction
section until they are familiar with Bay Area Real Estate Market
Newsletter. The introduction explains many of the unique features, lists
frequently used abbreviations, and provides detailed explanations of the data
that is used in the Bay Area Real Estate Market Newsletter. Your thoughts and/or
comments about the real estate market conditions and/or Bay Area Real Estate
Market Newsletter are always appreciated. Creekside Realty would like to assist you with
your real estate needs; just
email us.
Background
During
the past 6-years of collecting and analyzing real estate data for
Silicon Valley daily, weekly and monthly; it has become clear that adjusting a
real estate purchase and/or sale by even a few months has become
important in order to improve the investment aspect of your real estate
holdings. It is equally important to know when to be conservative and
when to be aggressive with your real estate pricing strategy.
Creekside
Realty believes the old saying 'just buy and hold real estate for the
long-term' can be improved significantly by adjusting the timing of your
purchase and/or sale by just a couple of months. This is because the local real
estate market has become volatile. There have been 4 peaks of about $570K
and 3 valleys of about $500K since April 2000. Santa Clara
County prices increased 17.2% in just 4 months early in 2002. Longer-term, prices
increased 108% in 21 months and fell 43% in a different 21 months.
Warning
Since
the MLS transition in July 2003 there have been numerous challenges.
Unfortunately, we continue to question the accuracy of the MLS database,
which is our source for our analysis. The most significant remaining issues
are:
1) DOM (days on the market): This use to be the length of time a property
was published on the MLS. Currently, this data is based on the list date
entered by the listing agent. This means that DOM can be reset to zero at
any time by the listing agent by simply re-listing the same property and may
have no relation to when the property went onto the MLS. As the market slows
down more agents will re-list their properties. Therefore DOM will be low
and not accurately reflect the degree of market slowing.
2) Number of initiated Sales: This is still being significantly overstated.
Previously, the sales date was the date the sales was first reported to the
MLS. Currently, there are several events that cause this sales date to be
over-written by a current date. If this happens to be in a subsequent month
then the initiated sale will count in both the original AND the subsequent
month.
3) Number of Closings: This is also being overstated, but to a much smaller
degree. Sometimes the MLS fails to delete the original listing when an agent
re-lists a property. The listing agent reports the sale and closing on both
listings causing a double count. This also cause an over stating of the
inventory when the listing prior to the offer being accepted. We have also
found a listing that closed in November 2003 but was being reported by the
MLS as also closing in May 2004.
Fortunately,
we believe that these errors are randomly distributed with respect to the
price and therefore the median prices reported should be pretty
accurate.
|